Trump Policies & People
An Overview of the Second Term
Overview

Background

During the first Trump administration, Dans served as a senior advisor in the Office of Community Planning and Development at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. In February 2020 he was appointed White House liaison and senior adviser to the director of the Office of Personnel Management, where he managed the federal agency responsible for human resources policy for more than two million federal workers, and he subsequently served as chief of staff to the OPM director, working to staff the approximately 4,000 presidential appointees across the federal government.

In January 2021, President Trump appointed Dans to a six-year term as Chairman of the National Capital Planning Commission, recognizing his expertise in urban development and policy. His OPM experience gave him an unusually detailed understanding of the personnel machinery of the executive branch — an understanding that would become central to Project 2025's design.

Public Role in the Second Trump Administration

Architect of Project 2025

Dans was appointed director of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project, known as Project 2025, by the Heritage Foundation on April 14, 2022. The group's leaders originally cast the initiative as candidate-agnostic, intended to assist the 2024 Republican nominee, whoever that might be. But there was no real doubt who the envisioned beneficiary was: the team included several former members of the Trump administration, and the whole effort was geared to address a perceived shortcoming of that White House — its failure to fill enough key government positions with Trump loyalists.

The effort consisted of four pillars: an 887-page policy plan, a database of conservatives willing to serve in the administration, training seminars for potential new appointees on the functions of government, and a battle plan for each agency. Developed with participation from major conservative groups, the multi-million dollar effort also spent several years building what was described as a "LinkedIn for conservatives" that an incoming administration could tap for hiring purposes.

The Trump Campaign's Disavowal

Project 2025 attracted attention for some of its more ambitious proposals in the policy plan, including reinstating more stringent rules for the use of the abortion pill mifepristone and abolishing some federal agencies. On the campaign trail, President Biden and Vice President Harris made the project the centerpiece of their case against a Trump restoration. Trump responded by publicly distancing himself from the effort. Trump told supporters during a rally that Project 2025 was written by people on the "severe right" and that its policies were "absolutely ridiculous and abysmal."

On July 30, 2024, Dans announced he was stepping down from his position as Director of Project 2025 at the Heritage Foundation. In a statement, Heritage said the decision to part ways was mutual and due to strategic differences, clarifying reports that Dans had been terminated over issues of alleged misconduct. In addition to stepping down from Project 2025, Dans also left the Heritage Foundation.

Despite the public break, the project's underlying influence proved durable. A CNN review found that many of Trump's early actions as president in his second term aligned with Project 2025's proposals. The disavowal during the campaign and the policy alignment afterward underscored the distinction between electoral politics and governing — Dans's work survived the campaign even as he did not.

Personnel and the Administrative State

Dans's specific contribution to Project 2025 was less about any single policy than about the infrastructure of conservative governance. His OPM background made the personnel pillar of the project his primary domain. So few had expected Trump to win in 2016 that hiring had been left mostly to GOP veterans who brought in establishment figures and never managed to fill some slots at all, leaving the president exposed to the bureaucratic resistance his acolytes believe undermined him at every step. This time, the goal was for Trump to take office with a fully staffed, carefully selected administration ready to roll. Dans was instrumental in building the vetted candidate database and the training seminars intended to realize that goal.

Recent Developments

Dans launched a Senate bid in South Carolina to oust incumbent Republican Lindsey Graham, announcing his Republican primary campaign in Charleston. Graham, a close friend of President Trump's, is seeking a fifth term and already has the president's backing. Chris LaCivita, a senior adviser to Graham's campaign who co-managed Trump's 2024 bid, said in a statement that Dans had "parachuted himself into the state of South Carolina in direct opposition to President Trump's longtime friend and ally in the Senate."

Dans campaigned on restoring faith-based values, tackling the national debt, and ending what he described as endless wars through an America First approach. He differentiated himself from Graham by portraying the incumbent as offering mere lip service to conservative principles, and he drew on his Project 2025 experience to propose bringing its reform blueprint to Senate policymaking. Dans framed the Senate itself as a bottleneck to further conservative change, saying: "If you look at where the chokepoint is, it's the United States Senate. That's the headwaters of the swamp."

Early polling showed Graham leading with 41 percent on the initial ballot, followed by a second challenger at 21 percent, with Dans at 11 percent. Graham faced several challengers in the Republican primary, including Dans and businessman Mark Lynch. The primary contest remained one of the more closely watched intraparty races of the 2026 cycle, given Dans's national profile and Graham's complicated history with the MAGA wing of the party.

Outlook

Dans enters the South Carolina primary as the underdog, facing a well-funded incumbent with an explicit presidential endorsement. His path to victory would require convincing Republican primary voters that Graham's personal loyalty to Trump is insufficient cover for a career record that the MAGA movement views with deep suspicion. Whether the Project 2025 brand, which was toxic enough during the 2024 campaign to prompt Trump's own disavowal, becomes an asset or a liability in a South Carolina GOP primary remains an open question.

More broadly, Dans represents a type increasingly present in the Trump political ecosystem: the policy architect who helped generate the intellectual infrastructure of the second term and now seeks to translate that role into direct political power. His candidacy is a measure of how far the project's ideas have traveled from controversy to claimed vindication — and how the men who built those ideas are positioning themselves for the next phase of conservative politics, inside or outside the administration.

Sources

CNN, "Project 2025 director steps down amid backlash from Trump" (Jul 2024)

CBS News, "Head of pro-Trump Project 2025 steps down as Democrats ramp up attacks" (Jul 2024)

NBC News, "Project 2025 winding down policy work following criticism from Trump" (Jul 2024)

NBC News, "Project 2025 architect Paul Dans to challenge Lindsey Graham for Senate in South Carolina" (Jul 2025)

ProPublica, "Project 2025 Trump Campaign Heritage Foundation Paul Dans" (Jul 2024)

The Heritage Foundation, "Heritage Announces 2025 Presidential Transition Project, Hiring of Paul Dans to Direct New Initiative" (Apr 2022)

Newsweek, "Lindsey Graham's Chances of Losing in South Carolina Senate Race — Polls" (Mar 2026)

Wikipedia, "Paul Dans" (updated 2026)

Yahoo News / The Hill, "Project 2025 author challenging Graham in SC" (2025)

Further Reading

Further Reading and Listening

Paul Dans, the Man Behind Project 2025's Most Radical Plans

ProPublica, August 1, 2024

Alec MacGillis's deep-reported profile of Dans traces his path from Trump's Office of Personnel Management to architect of a "conservative LinkedIn" database of more than 10,000 vetted job candidates intended to staff a second Trump administration — essential background for understanding how Project 2025 moved from blueprint to governing reality.

Paul Dans on Project 2025

C-SPAN Washington Journal, February 20, 2025

Dans speaks in his own words, one month into Trump's second term, about the intended purpose of Project 2025 and the degree to which the new administration had already begun implementing it — a rare primary-source appearance after his Heritage Foundation departure.

The man who led Project 2025 gives his assessment of Trump's first 100 days

NBC News, April 2025

Dans evaluates Trump's early second-term actions, calling them "Trump's real deal" — a direct dismantling of what he characterizes as decades of progressive administrative architecture — and flags the coming legal battles over executive power as the next critical front.

Podcast: What Is Project 2025?

NPR Politics Podcast, July 10, 2024

NPR's Franco Ordoñez, who interviewed Dans directly, explains that Dans called Trump "the embodiment of the project" and characterized it as "a clarion call for conservatives" — a contemporaneous account of Dans's own framing before his resignation.

Paul Dans on the 2025 Presidential Transition Project

C-SPAN Washington Journal, September 3, 2023

An earlier C-SPAN appearance in which Dans outlines the project's four pillars — policy guide, personnel database, presidential academy, and transition playbook — providing essential context for how he envisioned transforming conservative ambition into governing infrastructure.

Inside Project 2025's Secret Training Videos

ProPublica, August 13, 2024

Based on dozens of never-before-published internal videos, this ProPublica and Documented investigation reveals how Project 2025 trained prospective political appointees — including guidance on erasing climate references from federal communications — illuminating the operational machinery Dans built alongside the public-facing policy document.

Podcast: Is Project 2025 happening?

NPR Politics Podcast, April 21, 2025

NPR correspondents assess how much of the Dans-designed blueprint Trump incorporated during his first 100 days, noting that Project 2025 authors including Russell Vought and Karoline Leavitt moved directly into senior administration roles — a useful scorecard for the plan's real-world translation.

Trump, Project 2025 and the 'Dismantling' of the 'Administrative State'

FactCheck.org, October 2025

FactCheck.org documents Dans's direct role in crafting Schedule F — the civil-service reclassification he co-authored in the Mandate for Leadership — and traces how Trump's second-term reinstatement of that policy reflects Dans's specific bureaucratic strategy, with on-record quotes from Dans himself.

Project 2025 architect quits South Carolina Senate race and endorses Lindsey Graham challenger

CNN Politics, April 10, 2026

Dans's abrupt Senate exit — on the final day to remove his name from the ballot — ended with Trump publicly celebrating his departure and attacking Tucker Carlson's endorsement of Dans as the "KISS OF DEATH," illustrating the ongoing tension between Dans and the MAGA establishment he helped build.

Project 2025 author Paul Dans drops primary challenge to Lindsey Graham in South Carolina

PBS NewsHour / Associated Press, April 13, 2026

The AP's authoritative account of Dans's withdrawal places it in the broader context of Trump's loyalty politics during the 2026 midterms, noting that Graham had locked in the endorsements of both Trump and South Carolina's senior Republicans, leaving Dans with no viable path — a revealing coda to his post-Heritage trajectory.

Discussion

All comments and responses are publicly visible.

To comment, you must register with a working email address.

Because the site is updated regularly, if you are commenting on a specific passage, consider copying the relevant text into your comment so readers can tell exactly what you are referring to.

We especially welcome proposed topics, corrections, and suggestions.

Please address the subject matter rather than other commenters personally. Spam, abusive material, substantially off-topic comments, and other inappropriate comments may be removed.

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest